Editorial Policy

How we research

Every guide begins with a real, specific question — not a generic topic. We review manufacturer specifications, independent certifications, and published standards before we write a recommendation.

How we evaluate products

We research each product against manufacturer documentation, independent certifications, and reputable published sources. We do not run our own product tests or lab measurements: when a guide mentions test results, they come from the source it cites. We do not accept manufacturer-supplied samples for review, and we never let a brand influence a conclusion.

How we choose what to recommend

We prioritise verified sustainability credentials — certifications such as compostable, FSC, or recognised cruelty-free standards — over vague or unverifiable “eco” marketing language. When a claim cannot be substantiated, we say so, and when the honest answer is “skip it,” we say that too.

Independence

At the moment, none of our published articles or pages contain affiliate links. If we add them, they will be disclosed and will never affect what we recommend or how we assess a product. Our editorial team makes all decisions independently of commercial relationships, and no one outside the editorial team can edit a conclusion for commercial reasons.

Corrections

If we get something wrong, we correct it promptly, and the guide's “Last updated” date changes. You can reach us any time via our contact page.

Images

Cover images illustrate the topic of a guide. Some are AI-generated, and some are stock photos (for example from Unsplash, used under the Unsplash License). They are not photographs of products we have tested, and they are not evidence for any claim in the guide — the sources linked in the text are.

Suggest a topic

We welcome suggestions for products and topics to cover. Send us a note and tell us what you'd like us to cover next.